ArticleGenomics & informatics2025
A curation system of rice trait ontology with reliable interoperation by LLM and PubAnnotation.
Article in Genomics & informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- scCAPReSE: detection of large-scale genomic rearrangements from single-cell Hi-C based on few-shot learning.Genomics & informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOntology frameworks are essential for organizing complex biological knowledge, such as genes, phenotypes, and pathways, and for ensuring consistent data annotation and retrieval. In biological research, ontologies like the Gene Ontology (GO) and crop-specific trait ontologies (TO) for Oryza sativa (rice) standardize terminology across studies, supporting cross-study comparison and hypothesis generation. However, ontology annotations usually rely on expert manual review of the literature, a process that is accurate but time-consuming, labor-intensive, and difficult to scale as biological data grows. Manual approaches are also prone to inconsistencies and errors. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and KIMI, along with curated databases like Rice-Alterome and PubAnnotation, offers new opportunities for semi-automated ontology curation. This study explores how these technologies can be integrated to develop an efficient literature-based curation system for rice trait ontology.
methodsWe developed a curation system that integrates Rice-Alterome-a comprehensive database of rice genomic variations, mutations, and sentence-level literature evidence linked to GO and TO terms with PubAnnotation, an open-source platform for collaborative text annotation. LLMs (DeepSeek and KIMI) were integrated via APIs to automate the extraction, annotation, and validation of trait-related information via prompt engineering. The system was evaluated through use cases designed to demonstrate its performance and functionality compared to manual curation.
resultsThe proposed system substantially enhanced the retrieval and organization of literature evidence compared to manual methods. The integrated platform, available through a dedicated website, connects Rice-Alterome, PubAnnotation, and LLMs to streamline ontology curation and evidence discovery. This framework reduces the time domain experts need to locate and validate relevant information and provides interactive tools for users to add, merge, or refine trait annotations. The LLM-driven prompt-based querying also improved the identification of implicit or missing information that may be overlooked during manual curation.
conclusionsIntegrating LLMs with Rice-Alterome and PubAnnotation offers a promising solution for automating rice trait ontology curation. This approach accelerates evidence collection and enhances data consistency and accessibility. Future extensions of this framework will target additional crops such as wheat and maize and focus on refining LLM-based retrieval and annotation mechanisms for broader agricultural genomics applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.