ArticleBiomarker research2025
Non-invasive prediction of Ki-67 and p53 biomarkers in spinal ependymoma via deep learning: using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data.
Article in Biomarker research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal ependymoma prognosis is closely correlated with tumor malignancy and biomarker levels, such as Ki-67 and p53, which reflect cellular proliferation and genetic instability. Despite their clinical significance, current methods to assess these biomarkers rely on invasive postoperative immunohistochemistry (IHC), delaying critical treatment decisions and limiting preoperative planning. While deep learning have revolutionized biomarker prediction in brain tumors, their application to spinal ependymomas remains underexplored due to the rarity of these tumors, insufficient datasets, and the technical challenges of analyzing spinal cord MRI. We used a deep learning model to predict molecular markers for spinal ependymomas using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and clinical information to predict biomarkers for spinal ependymoma.
methodsThis study enrolled 352 patients with preoperative MRI, confirmed histological diagnoses of spinal ependymomas, and Ki-67 and p53 status assessed via IHC. Cross-validation and external testing strategies ensured the generalizability of the results. We harnessed multimodal information by integrating the sagittal and transverse MRI phases with clinical data. MRI scans were automatically segmented to extract high-quality features. These features were used to train an ensemble neural network model, Light Gradient Boosting Machine Net (LGBMNet), which predicted the expression of Ki-67 and p53 biomarkers. To validate model architecture and input choice, we conducted ablation and comparison experiments across multiple classifiers and feature subsets.
resultsHigh-precision automatic image segmentation was achieved using the SegFormer model. LGBMNet showed superior predictive power in cross-validation for Ki-67 and p53, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.8904 and 0.8948, and externally validated with AUCs of 0.8348 and 0.8521, respectively. The full multimodal LGBMNet model consistently outperformed reduced and classical variants, highlighting the added value of neural-enhanced fusion.
conclusionsThis study developed a deep learning framework for non-invasive prediction of Ki-67 and p53 in spinal ependymomas, integrating multimodal MRI and clinical data. The SegFormer model achieved high-precision segmentation, ensuring robust feature extraction. LGBMNet, combining Multilayer Perceptron and Light Gradient Boosting Machine, demonstrated strong predictive performance. Our results confirm that deep learning can effectively predict tumor biomarkers preoperatively, aiding precision neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.