ArticleBMC medicine2025
Sleep and physical activity trade-offs and dementia risk: a prospective cohort study in UK Biobank participants.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between accelerometer-assessed occupational and leisure-time sitting and self-reported cognitive dysfunction in Swedish middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional analysis from the SCAPIS study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines and mental health outcomes in Chinese university students.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Independent and joint associations of sleep duration and physical activity with cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of 1.6 million US adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEngaging in regular physical activity and obtaining recommended amounts of sleep are touted as strategies to promote healthy brain aging. However, as each day is only 24 h long, changing time spent in one activity must come at the expense or gain of another, making it necessary to understand how the whole 24-h activity composition is associated with dementia risk. We investigated the effect of substituting sleep duration for different levels of physical activity (i.e., inactivity, light activity, and moderate to vigorous physical activity; MVPA) in short sleepers (< 6 h) and normal sleepers (≥ 6 h and ≤ 9 h).
methodsThe study sample comprised 87,490 participants from the community-based UK Biobank, with 24-h behaviors estimated using up to 7 days of accelerometry. Participants were free from dementia or severe neurological disease at baseline. The main outcome was the risk of incident all-cause dementia over a median follow-up of 8.2 years.
resultsThe mean age of the sample was 63 years (Q1, Q3, 56, 68); 56% were women. For short sleepers, increasing sleep duration was associated with a lowering of dementia risk when at the expense of inactivity or light activity, but not when at the expense of MVPA. For normal sleepers, the effect of increasing or decreasing sleep duration on dementia risk differed for all three substituted behaviors (i.e., inactivity, light, or MVPA). Most notably, increasing sleep at the expense of MVPA was associated with greater dementia risk, and increasing MVPA at the expense of sleep was associated with lower dementia risk. The interpretation of the results was broadly consistent when using MRI-based outcomes (e.g., hippocampal volume) in a subset with brain imaging (n = 15,180).
conclusionsOur findings from this observational analysis suggest that personalized approaches that balance trade-offs between sleep duration and differing physical activity levels based on individual circumstances, such as habitual sleep duration, may be important for dementia risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.