ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025
Network analysis of multidimensional symptom experience among postoperative esophageal cancer survivors.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative symptom burden is considerable and markedly undermines the quality of life of esophageal cancer (EC) survivors. This study aimed to examine symptom clusters and the interrelationships among symptoms in postoperative EC survivors, with the goal of identifying core symptoms.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using the European Cancer Life Questionnaire and the EC-Specific Supplementary Questionnaire. EC survivors were recruited in Shandong between February 2023 and February 2024. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to identify symptom clusters, while Gaussian graphical network models were used to estimate the network structure.
resultsA total of 460 EC survivors were included in the study, revealing three distinct symptom clusters: the reflux-dysphagia cluster, the respiratory-related symptom cluster, and the recovery-fatigue cluster. The final network model demonstrated interconnections among these symptoms. "Fatigue" (FA) exhibited the highest strength centrality, identifying it as the most prominent core symptom in the network. "Emotional functioning" (EF), "Fatigue" (FA), and "cognitive functioning" (CF) ranked highest in terms of bridge strengths. Additionally, the model showed excellent network stability.
conclusionsEC survivors experienced significant postoperative symptom burden, with symptom network analysis revealing the complex interrelations among postoperative symptoms. This approach also identified core symptoms that play a crucial role in the network. Fatigue emerged as the most influential core symptom, highlighting the significance of targeted interventions to mitigate negative symptom interactions and improve quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.