ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
Development and validation of the Hypotensive Exposure Duration Index for mortality risk prediction in critically ill patients.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood pressure management is crucial in critical care, but relationships between pressure patterns and outcomes remain incompletely understood. We analyzed minute-by-minute blood pressure data to develop and validate a novel index quantifying hypotensive exposure burden.
methodsIn this retrospective study using the Salzburg Intensive Care Database, 11,059 ICU admissions with continuous invasive arterial monitoring were analyzed. Heatmaps were constructed from high-resolution hemodynamic data to visualize relationships between blood pressure thresholds (52-120 mmHg), exposure durations (5 min-5 h), and mortality. The Hypotensive Exposure Duration Index (HEDI) was developed to quantify cumulative hypotensive burden by integrating exposure across multiple MAP thresholds. HEDI's prognostic value was evaluated through nine machine learning algorithms. External validation using the eICU database assessed HEDI's consistency across different populations.
resultsNon-survivors showed significantly higher HEDI compared to survivors (0.47 [-0.20, 1.43] vs. -0.15 [-0.41, 0.27], p < 0.001). HEDI demonstrated increasing predictive capability, with AUC values rising from 0.624 at 24 h to 0.700 at 72 h post-admission. The Extra Trees classifier achieved exceptional performance (test AUC: 0.843), with HEDI ranking among the top predictive features. Both internal cross-validation and external validation confirmed the model's robustness, demonstrating HEDI's prognostic value across different patient populations, including both patients with and without vasopressor use.
conclusionsHEDI effectively quantifies cumulative hypotensive burden in critically ill patients, demonstrating significant predictive ability for ICU mortality validated across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.