Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331442›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

From injury to recovery: transcriptomic dynamics in zebrafish brain regeneration.

Sidharth Bhasin, Shruti Kaushal, Priyanka Prakash Srivastava, Manoj B Menon, Rajesh Ramachandran, Jaspreet Kaur Dhanjal, Shilpi Minocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sidharth Bhasin *Kusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-1649
Shruti Kaushal *Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIITD), Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2911-1292
Priyanka Prakash Srivastava *Kusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.ORCID 0009-0005-8437-0694
Manoj B MenonKusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5859-0347
Rajesh RamachandranDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Mohali, 140306, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9888-4750
Jaspreet Kaur DhanjalDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology (IIITD), Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi, 110020, India. jaspreet@iiitd.ac.in.
Shilpi MinochaKusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India. sminocha@bioschool.iitd.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0001-8229-1443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health challenge, leading to chronic cognitive and motor deficits. The limited neuroregenerative capacity of adult mammals hampers the development of effective therapies. In contrast, zebrafish exhibit remarkable brain regeneration, making them an ideal model for studying molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying TBI.

methodsThis study established a telencephalic stab wound injury model in zebrafish to mimic TBI. Transcriptomic analyses were performed at control, 1-day post-lesion (dpl), 4 dpl, and 7 dpl to identify dynamic transcriptional changes during brain regeneration. Key signaling pathways were identified, and functional inhibition experiments were conducted to evaluate the role of specific pathways in the regenerative process.

resultsTranscriptomic analysis revealed temporal transcriptional changes underlying brain regeneration, from early injury responses to proliferation and tissue remodeling. Key signaling pathways, including Insulin, FoxO, MAPK, mTOR, and NOD-like receptor signaling, were implicated in neural progenitor activation, proliferation, migration, and maintenance. The MAPK pathway, particularly p38α MAPK (MAPK14a), was identified as a critical regulator of the regenerative response. Functional inhibition of MAPK14a disrupted progenitor activation, impaired proliferation, and diminished neuronal and oligodendrocyte recovery, and led to increased cell death in neurogenic zones. Additionally, MAPK14a was found to influence Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT pathways further highlighted its integrative role in coordinating regeneration.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of zebrafish brain regeneration, highlighting MAPK14a as a central regulator of neural repair. These findings may inform strategies for enhancing brain repair in mammals.

Indexed as

BrainBrain InjuriesBrain RegenerationRecovery of FunctionTranscriptomeZebrafishAnimalsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCell ProliferationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationSignal TransductionBrain regenerationMAPK signalingRNA sequencingTranscriptomic dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41331442
PMCPMC12821200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.