ReviewBMC medical research methodology2025
The longitudinal qualitative research design in nursing, health, and social care research: philosophy, methodology, and methods.
Review in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe longitudinal qualitative research (LQR) approach is an emerging design in nursing research which focuses on examining changes in experiences over specified timepoints. While some authors have tied this approach to a specific qualitative tradition such as phenomenology and case study, other authors have associated it with two or more qualitative methodologies. Yet, others have also argued it is untied to a specific qualitative tradition. Thus, there is palpable confusion regarding whether it is a methodology or merely a method. Additionally, its guiding paradigm or philosophical/ theoretical foundations remain poorly articulated or loosely defined within the broader qualitative research tradition.
objectiveThis methodological discussion paper sought to examine the guiding paradigm/ philosophical underpinning, methodology, and methods unique to LQR to ground it within the broader qualitative research tradition. A secondary goal, perhaps more nuanced, is to generate further scholarly discussions regarding LQR and its application to nursing, health, and social care research.
designMethodological discussion
findingsWhen the term "longitudinal" is applied to a qualitative methodology, the emphasis is on repeated data collection informed by that methodology's theoretical perspective. However, when LQR is used, then it is to be considered as a methodology characterised by a focus on change, meaning, and time grounded in context, an emphasis on participants' own reflections of their subjective experiences and the researchers understanding of them. LQR emphasises reflective, second-order perspective (the world as experienced and perceived/ understood). With the need to uncover change across time, its dynamics, and mechanisms, LQR is argued to be potentially underpinned by the critical realist theoretical/ philosophical stance. Methodologically, LQR lends itself to methodical flexibility and pluralism. Despite its strengths, some challenges are noteworthy including attrition, time and resource demands, data management, ethical considerations, researcher bias, analytical complexity, contextual changes, and issues of transferability.
conclusionsLQR is a methodology fit for uncovering meaning, dynamics, and mechanisms of change over time and bound to specific contexts albeit its conduct requires careful planning and availability of adequate resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.