Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of innate and humoral immune mechanisms on vaccine induced protection against avian influenza H9N2 in broilers.

Hesham M Asaad, Ola Hassanin, Mustafa Saif-Edin, Ragab S Ibrahim, Moemen A Mohamed, Mustafa Hamad, Tamer Mahmoud Abdullatif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hesham M AsaadPoultry Diseases Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Ola HassaninAvian and Rabbit Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. olafalcon2001@yahoo.com.
Mustafa Saif-EdinAvian and Rabbit Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assuit, Egypt.
Ragab S IbrahimAvian and Rabbit Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assuit, Egypt.
Moemen A MohamedAvian and Rabbit Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assuit, Egypt.
Mustafa HamadSchool of Veterinary Medicne, Badr University, Assuit Branch, Assiut, Egypt.
Tamer Mahmoud AbdullatifAvian and Rabbit Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian influenza virus (AIV) (H9N2) is a highly contagious avian respiratory disease that causes significant economic losses in the poultry industry sector. Although immunological responses to AIV (H9N2) vaccinations have been extensively studied, little is known about how inactivated vaccines interact with the host’s innate and adaptive immune responses. Five commercially available inactivated avian influenza virus (AIV) H9N2 vaccines, each containing different virus strains and adjuvant compositions, were administered via subcutaneous injection to 4-day-old commercial broiler chicks. The effects of vaccination on the kinetics of chicken toll-like receptor (TLR) 5 and 7 pathways, along with their downstream cytokines and the expression profiles of major histocompatibility complex class I and 2 (MHC-1 and 2) expression profiles were investigated. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that immunization with inactivated H9N2 AIV vaccines activated pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), specifically TLR-5 and TLR-7, along with their downstream cytokines. These included the proinflammatory interleukin-6 (IL-6), antiviral interferon-alpha, and myxoma resistance protein 1 (Mx1). This activation was observed as early as 48 h post-vaccination and persisted for up to 7 days in the spleens of the vaccinated birds. Subcutaneous administration of either inactivated vaccine A or B elicited the highest expression levels of IL-6, MHC class I, and MHC-1 and MHC-2 molecules. Hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titers against avian influenza were > 5 log2 from two to five weeks post-vaccination, with vaccine A inducing significantly higher responses at weeks three, four, and five. Following intraocular challenge with 106 EID50/ml of a locally isolated avian influenza virus strain, vaccines A, B, and E conferred complete (100%) protection against mortality. Notably, vaccine A demonstrated superior clinical protection and resulted in minimal histopathological lesions in the tracheal and pulmonary tissues.

Indexed as

ChickensImmunity, HumoralImmunity, InnateInfluenza A Virus, H9N2 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesPoultry DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCytokinesVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralCytokinesInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedAvian influenzaChickenCytokineH9N2InterferonVaccine

Identifiers

PMID41331407
PMCPMC12675785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.