Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331396›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Anchor objects guide spatial attention during visual search.

Makayla Souza-Wiggins, Joy J Geng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Makayla Souza-WigginsCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, 267 Cousteau Pl, Davis, CA, USA. mhsouza@ucdavis.edu.
Joy J GengCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, 267 Cousteau Pl, Davis, CA, USA. jgeng@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS R01MH11385University of California, Davis Cota Robles
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic information is used to guide attention during scene-viewing, but how exactly does this occur? We tested the hypothesis that "anchor objects" are a special class of semantic associate essential to efficient target search in naturalistic scenes. Adult participants completed a RSVP search task for a target object preceded by a prime. In Experiment 1a (N = 210), the prime was either a semantic anchor or an unrelated object followed by a target in a congruent or incongruent spatial location relative to the prime. Experiment 1b (N = 157) served as a direct replication of Experiment 1a with a more selective stimulus set. In Experiment 2 (N = 158) the prime and target objects were reversed to assess the directionality of the effects. Results showed that semantically related objects facilitated target identification no matter which object was the prime. However, only anchor objects acted as predictive spatial cues, relative to control object pairs. The results indicate that anchor objects are a unique type of semantic associate, providing information about "what" objects are nearby and "where" they might be. The role of anchor objects in predicting the location of associated objects goes beyond both general scene regularities (e.g., "small things go on top of big things") and semantic associations (e.g., pots and stoves).

Indexed as

AttentionOrientationOrientation, SpatialPattern Recognition, VisualSemanticsSpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAnchor objectsAttentional guidanceSemanticsVisual search

Identifiers

PMID41331396
PMCPMC12672618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.