ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Nomogram to predict postoperative complications after surgical resection in adult patients with carotid body tumors.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection remains the primary treatment for carotid body tumors (CBTs), but it carries a considerable risk of postoperative complications. Although several predictors have been identified, no validated tool currently exists to estimate the individualized risk of complications in CBT patients. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting postoperative complications following CBT resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients who underwent surgical resection for CBTs at our institution between 2016 and 2022. Potential predictors of postoperative complications, including stroke and cranial nerve injury, were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was then constructed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling and 10-fold cross-validation. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Results: A total of 230 patients (240 tumors) were included. Postoperative complications occurred in 38.3% of tumors, including 9 strokes and 83 cranial nerve injuries. The final nomogram incorporated the Shamblin classification, prior cerebral ischemia, and white blood cell count as independent predictors, achieving an AUC of 0.72 with a cutoff value of 94.6 for predicting postoperative complications. Conclusions: The proposed nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability and calibration for predicting postoperative complications after CBT surgery. It may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and optimizing perioperative management strategies. Further external validation across diverse populations is warranted to confirm its generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41331383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.