ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
CT/MRI imaging and immunohistochemical analyses of eosinophilic vacuolar tumor of the kidney: case reports of four patients.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor of the kidney misdiagnosed as upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify the imaging features, clinicopathological characteristics and imaging-pathology correlation, of eosinophilic vacuolar tumor of the kidney (EVT).
methodsPre-operative imaging (2 CT and 2 MRI, both including dynamic contrast imaging) and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed for 4 EVT patients (2 male, 2 female) between January 2022-December 2024. Follow-up was performed for 2-11 months post-partial nephrectomy. All the findings were compared to previous cases in the literature.
resultsEVT patients had an average age of 43 years, and average maximum tumor diameter of 3.8 cm (range 2.8-5 cm). In 2 cases, contrast-enhanced CT showed patterns associated with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma, respectively, and in 2 other cases MRI scans showed masses with isointense or hypointense T1 and hyperintense T2 (relative to the renal parenchyma), with contrast enhancement showing abundant vessels similar to those observed for ccRCC. Histologically, EVT cells were arranged in nests and sheets, with abundant highly vacuolar eosinophilic cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli, and rare mitotic figures. IHC found that they were positive for CD117, PAX8, e-cadherin, among others, and negative for cytokeratin 7, carbonic anhydrase IX, and vimentin. Ki67 proliferation index was 5%, and patients were tumor-free at a mean follow-up of 7 months.
conclusionEVT is a rare renal tumor entity with characteristic imaging features, though its imaging presentation may vary depending on the underlying pathology. Accurate identification of EVT will contribute to improving the classification and diagnosis of renal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41331354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.