ArticleScientific reports2025
How digital twin technology revitalizes exhibits and enhances visitors' appreciation for ceramic collections in online museum tours.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ontology-Driven and Human-Centric Digital Twins in Hospitality: A Survey and Research Agenda.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Digital health technology empowering China's community full life cycle health management.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing application of digital twin technology in various fields, many museums are starting to use this technology to build online platforms, and initial success has been achieved. During online tours, visitors' emotional and cognitive experiences are shaped by many different factors, which further influence their appreciation of the exhibits. Based on this, the paper analyzes visitors' experiences and feelings during online tours of the Palace Museum's Ceramic Gallery from the perspective of Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT). The research results show that both hedonic gratification and social gratification during the tour contribute to building positive emotional experiences for visitors, thereby increasing their appreciation of the exhibits. Similarly, utilitarian gratification and technological gratification can enhance cognitive experiences, which also lead to a greater appreciation of the exhibits. Among all research variables selected in this study, only Enjoyment and Self-Presentation did not show significant effects, while the impacts of other variables were very prominent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.