Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331323›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fundamental insights into gallium leaching for sustainable electronic waste recovery.

Aylin Nur Erkmen, Roland Ulber, Thomas Jüstel, Mirjam Altendorfner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aylin Nur ErkmenThe Department of Chemical Engineering, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Steinfurt, 48565, Germany. aylin.erkmen@fh-muenster.de.
Roland UlberThe Department of Bioprocess Engineering, The University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, 67663, Germany.
Thomas JüstelThe Department of Chemical Engineering, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Steinfurt, 48565, Germany.
Mirjam AltendorfnerThe Department of Chemical Engineering, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Steinfurt, 48565, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study systematically concerns the leaching behavior and dissolution kinetics of gallium (Ga). The objective was to identify sustainable leaching agents by incorporating organic acid reagents. Using a novel approach involving pH-adjusted experiments, the findings elucidated the dissolution behavior, delineating acidolysis and complexolysis. The screening results demonstrated the efficacy of oxalic acid (10 mM), which extracted 1105.2 ± 61.4 mg/L of Ga at pH 1.2. Dissolution kinetics based on the shrinking core model (SCM) revealed a synergistic mechanism governed by film diffusion and surface chemical reaction control, with chemical reaction control dominating at higher temperatures. One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) experiments clarified the influence of experimental parameters on Ga leaching yield. In addition, the Box-Behnken design (BBD) was employed to evaluate parameter interactions, confirming the significance of the process parameters, including interaction terms, while characterizing the model in terms of a quadratic expression. Under optimized conditions: 710.55 mM acid concentration, a reaction temperature of [Formula: see text]C, and a solid loading of 50 g/L, 37% of Ga was effectively extracted within 3.2 hours. These findings underscore the selectivity and operational compatibility of oxalic acid compared to conventional leaching agents, emphasizing its promising integration into biogenic production pathways and sustainable closed-loop gallium recovery processes.

Indexed as

Critical metalsGalliumMetal leachingOxalic acidSustainable chemistry

Identifiers

PMID41331323
PMCPMC12675773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.