Trial reportScientific reports2025
Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 to 6 years of age of an early intervention program in preterm infants.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02983513 (Early Intervention in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Intervention in Preterm Infants: Effects of a Parental Training Program on Neonatal Brain Development, Visual Functions and Neurobehavioral Outcome
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm birth presents long-term neurodevelopmental complications imposing substantial burdens on affected children and families. Early intervention (EI) programs have shown promise in mitigating these challenges, but their long-term efficacy remains unclear. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants following participation in a parent-based EI program during NICU stay. Additionally, the study investigates the modulation of LINE1 promoter methylation at early school age. We conducted a secondary analysis of a larger RCT that included preterm infants (25-29 weeks gestational age) randomized to receive Standard Care (SC) or Early Intervention (EI), including parental training and multisensory experiences. At 5-6 years, neurodevelopmental assessments were conducted and LINE1 promoter methylation levels were analyzed in buccal swab samples. 36 infants (21 EI, 15 SC) completed the long-term follow-up and were included in the present analysis. EI children exhibited significantly higher Griffiths scores compared to the SC group (mean General Developmental Quotient: EI = 90.4 SC = 82.3, p = 0.003). Longitudinal analysis performed with a mixed model revealed sustained benefits of EI, with increasing divergence in developmental outcomes over time. LINE1 methylation analysis did not reveal significant variations between groups. This study demonstrates the potential of EI programs in improving long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. These findings underscore the need for continued research into effective intervention strategies to optimize outcomes for preterm-born children.Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02983513).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.