ArticleScientific reports2025
A high precision and lightweight method for steel surface defect detection based on improved YOLOv5.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting surface defects in steel is essential for ensuring structural safety and manufacturing efficiency. However, existing detection systems often struggle to accurately identify small flaws, handle complex surface conditions, and maintain real-time performance. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes ASFRW-YOLO, an enhanced version of the YOLOv5 framework. The model integrates a multi-scale ASF module to improve sensitivity to minute defects, replaces the conventional C3 module with RepNCSPELAN4 to strengthen feature representation, and adopts the Wise-IoU loss with adaptive weighting to refine bounding box regression. Experiments were conducted on the NEU-DET dataset, which was divided into training, validation, and testing sets with an 8:1:1 ratio. The proposed method achieved a mean Average Precision of 83.2% at an IoU threshold of 0.5 and 46.4% across IoU thresholds from 0.5 to 0.95, representing an improvement of approximately seven percentage points compared with YOLOv5s. Moreover, the model maintains a lightweight design with only 6.20 million parameters and processes 640 × 640 input images at about 125 frames per second on an RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8 GB VRAM). These results demonstrate that ASFRW-YOLO effectively balances detection accuracy, computational efficiency, and model compactness, making it highly suitable for real-time industrial defect inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.