Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Inertia mechanisms in networks and knowledge diffusion in team inertia networks.

Pengfei Zhang, Haifeng Du, Yaxin Cheng, Xiaochen He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengfei ZhangSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Haifeng DuSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yaxin ChengSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaochen HeSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. xiaochenhe@xjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72104194National Natural Science Foundation of China 72541006Shaanxi Teacher Development Research Program SJS2022ZD006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge diffusion is a critical driver of innovation, and team-based diffusion has increasingly become the dominant mode of knowledge diffusion. However, its efficiency is strongly shaped by inertia mechanisms embedded within teams. To capture this phenomenon, this paper first formalizes inertia mechanisms in networks, distinguishing between temporal inertia and spatial inertia. Building on this foundation, we propose a team inertia network model that integrates both forms of inertia and specify its evolutionary dynamics. Through extensive simulation experiments, we examine how temporal and spatial inertia jointly affect knowledge diffusion. The results indicate that moderate spatial inertia can enhance the average knowledge level of a team, whereas excessive or insufficient spatial inertia reduces diffusion efficiency. The impact of temporal inertia depends on communication density and knowledge dimensionality, where tighter connectivity enables members to gain more balanced benefits, reflected in a more stable Gini coefficient and more stable negative spatial autocorrelation. This work contributes a novel modeling framework for analyzing team knowledge evolution and provides practical insights for designing team structures and communication strategies that leverage inertia mechanisms to improve knowledge sharing, innovation capacity, and collaborative efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID41331278
PMCPMC12675777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.