Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting visual acuity using optical coherence tomography in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Sehwan Moon, Sungyong Park, Chul Gu Kim, Jeongmin Kim, Yi Sang Yoon, Jae Hui Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Macular degeneration collection.Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sehwan Moon *Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Sungyong Park *MODULABS, Seoul, South Korea.
Chul Gu KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, #156 Youngdeungpo-dong 4ga, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-034, South Korea.
Jeongmin KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, #156 Youngdeungpo-dong 4ga, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-034, South Korea.
Yi Sang Yoon *Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, #156 Youngdeungpo-dong 4ga, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-034, South Korea. dbsdltkd@naver.com.
Jae Hui Kim *Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, #156 Youngdeungpo-dong 4ga, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-034, South Korea. kimoph@gmail.com.

Funding

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute 25ZK1100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of an artificial intelligence(AI) model to predict visual acuity(VA) using optical coherence tomography(OCT) in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This retrospective study enrolled 240 patients(240 eyes) with pseudophakic neovascular AMD who received antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Each patient underwent 10 visits where they underwent best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) testing and horizontal OCT scans, yielding 2,400 images. The images were cropped, resized to 224 × 224 pixels, and partitioned at the patient level to avoid data leakage. A pretrained VGG16 CNN was modified for five-class VA classification (< 0.1, 0.1-0.3, 0.3-0.5, 0.5-0.8, ≥ 0.8). The performance was assessed by five-fold cross-validation using the macro-averaged AUC, accuracy, Top-2 accuracy, and binary accuracy (threshold VA = 0.5). The average performance showed a macro-averaged AUC of 0.772, accuracy of 50.3%, Top-2 accuracy of 71.0%, and binary accuracy of 79.6%. For high-confidence predictions (29.2% of the samples), the accuracy improved to 74.1%, with a binary accuracy of 94.2%. ROC analyses demonstrated AUCs of 0.73-0.83 across VA categories, with the strongest discrimination for VA < 0.1 (AUC 0.83). The confusion matrix showed that the VA 0.5-0.8 and ≥ 0.8 categories achieved relatively higher accuracies; however, misclassifications mainly occurred between these adjacent ranges, with frequent bidirectional errors observed. Our pretrained VGG16 showed moderate ability at predicting VA from OCT images in patients with neovascular AMD. While the overall classification was limited, high binary accuracy highlights the potential clinical value of distinguishing good from poor vision.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAge-related macular degenerationArtificial intelligenceOptical coherence tomographyVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID41331277
PMCPMC12764764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.