Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331268›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2026

Recent progress in genomic prediction for Hanwoo cattle and its implications for beef quality: review.

Monira Akter Mou, Md Azizul Haque, Jong-Joo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monira Akter MouDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.
Md Azizul HaqueDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.
Jong-Joo KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and ForestryMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs RS-2025-02307074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has become an indispensable tool in the beef cattle industry, offering the potential to significantly enhance genetic gain and prediction accuracy by integrating genomic, pedigree, and phenotypic information to estimate genomic breeding values. Hanwoo cattle (HC) are valued in the Korean Peninsula, for their exceptional marbling and distinct flavor. Thus, genetic improvement breeding programs for Hanwoo have been undertaken to improve beef production and profitability, emphasizing particular focus on carcass and meat quality traits. The success of a breeding program that incorporates genomic information in HC is largely dependent on prediction accuracy, thereby making genomic prediction (GP) essential for accelerating genetic gain. Hence, breeders must recognize the superiority of GS and choose the most suitable prediction model based on the genetic architecture and biological nature of the trait of interest. Several GP methods have already proven superior performance regarding carcass and meat quality traits compared to the traditional pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction method. Consequently, no alternative approaches exist for breeders to accelerate the innovative development of Hanwoo beef cattle to GS. The main objective of this review is to provide an overview of the application of GP methods in improving the ultimate meat quality of HC. Furthermore, this review presents the transversal analysis of interest in GS for Hanwoo breeders regarding the selection of best prediction methods for specific traits. This review literature is expected to serve as a significant resource for future exploitation of Hanwoo's potential in the Korean beef industry.

Indexed as

Beef CattleGenomic Best Linear Unbiased PredictionGenomic SelectionHanwooPrediction Accuracy

Identifiers

PMID41331268
PMCPMC13175064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.