ArticleScientific data2025
A whole-genome sequencing dataset of nanopore raw signals for bacterial genotyping and methylation analysis.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A whole-genome sequencing dataset of nanopore raw signals for bacterial genotyping and methylation analysis.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This dataset comprises raw signal data from a multicenter study evaluating the accuracy of bacterial whole-genome genotyping using Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing. The raw data comprises 79 isolates across six bacterial species, including 12 triplicates from three different laboratories (totalling ~1.4 TB of data). Sequencing was conducted on the latest R10.4.1 flow cells with V14 chemistry, producing on average 16 gigabases per flow cell. The generated raw ion current signals retain information beyond nucleotide sequences, supporting in-depth reanalysis for nucleotide modifications, resistance genes, and bacterial strain differentiation. The dataset enables re-basecalling with future models to keep up with the newest developments, e.g. to mitigate methylation-based calling errors, enhancing the reliability of SNP profiling and cgMLST analyses crucial for genomic surveillance. By sharing this raw signal data, accompanied by additional phenotypic resistance-data and an extensive quality control pipeline, we aim to advance reproducibility, support error correction studies and the continued development of bioinformatics tools, and encourage sharing raw data for broader genomic and epigenetic investigations as general best practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.