ReviewSpine deformity2026
State of the art review: enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) protocols in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Review in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to optimize perioperative care and expedite recovery for patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Historically, postoperative care for AIS emphasized prolonged immobility and variable practices driven largely by surgeon preference. In recent years, ERAS pathways have been developed to standardize care through preoperative education and optimization, multimodal intraoperative analgesia and blood conservation, and early postoperative mobilization with expedited transition to oral pain regimens. This review identified 24 studies describing ERAS implementation for AIS. Across the included studies, ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay by 25-55% (mean reduction of 1.44 days), facilitated earlier mobilization, and decreased opioid consumption without compromising pain control, complication rates, or readmissions. While some studies demonstrated cost savings, others showed increased costs, with intraoperative surgeon-dependent factors such as implant density and bone graft utilization emerging as dominant cost drivers. Quality improvement strategies, including Lean process mapping and plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, were commonly used to support implementation, and studies demonstrated persistent, sustainable benefits over multiple years with moderate-to-good adherence. ERAS pathways have become an integral strategy for improving perioperative care in AIS surgery, offering reliable reductions in length of stay, opioid use, and time to mobilization, though further work is needed to standardize protocols and clarify their impact on healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41331229What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.