Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331206›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Are Difficult Inpatients Also Difficult Primary Care Patients?

Jeffrey L Jackson, Akira Kuriyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey L JacksonDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Clement J Zablocki VAMD, Milwaukee, WI, USA. jjackson@mcw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9820-5834
Akira KuriyamaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients in both inpatient and clinic settings are sometimes experienced as difficult by their providers. Among inpatients, characteristics that increase difficulty include personality disorders, length of stay, and chronic pain. Among ambulatory patients, difficulty is increased by having medically unexplained symptoms, mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, and personality disorders or chronic pain.

objectiveOur study's purpose was to explore whether patients experienced by inpatient providers as difficult are also considered difficult by their primary care providers (PCPs) and whether patients perceived as difficult have similar characteristics in the two settings.

designIn this prospective cohort of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients, we compared patient difficulty ratings by providers in both inpatient and primary care clinic settings. We randomly sampled hospitalized veterans and asked their inpatient and primary care providers to complete surveys assessing patient difficulty using dichotomous (yes/no) and continuous (0-10, sliding scale) questions. Inpatient providers were surveyed from April to Nov 2023 and PCPs from Jan to Sept 2024. We abstracted patient characteristics from the electronic health record. KEY

resultsAmong 192 inpatients,161 (84%) had PCPs. PCPs completed surveys on 132 (82%) of the eligible inpatients. Sixty-seven percent of difficult inpatients were also rated as difficult by their primary care providers. Independent predictors of clinic difficulty included inpatient difficulty (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.1-12.4), having a personality disorder (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.1-8.5), or depression (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.9).

conclusionMost difficult inpatients were also considered difficult by their PCPs. Personality disorders and depression increased difficulty for PCPs.

Indexed as

InpatientsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID41331206
PMCPMC13421685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.