ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Spatially incompatible tool use does not induce tactile neglect.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Operating a tool that moves incompatibly with one's own body invokes conflict between representations of anticipated body-related and environment-related movement consequences. To revolve such conflict, agents might down-regulate (or "neglect") representations of body-related movement consequences during action preparation and execution. We tested body-related neglect by probing participants' tactile sensitivity when operating a tool which moved either spatially compatible or incompatible to their operating hand. Across four experiments, we found no evidence for conflict-induced body-neglect. These results suggest that any potential downregulation of body-related movement components does not extend to the processing of tactile stimulation. We discuss these results with respect to applied settings in which incompatibly moving tools are routinely used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.