Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331180›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2025

Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of Loropetalum chinense and its purplish-red-flowered variety.

Lilin Chen, Yu Song, Zhiyong Zhang, Huimin Li

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lilin ChenKey Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Ministry of Education), University Engineering Research Center of Bioinformation and Genetic Improvement of Specialty Crops, and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China.
Yu SongKey Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Ministry of Education), University Engineering Research Center of Bioinformation and Genetic Improvement of Specialty Crops, and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China.
Zhiyong ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Ministry of Education), University Engineering Research Center of Bioinformation and Genetic Improvement of Specialty Crops, and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China. zhangzy@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn.
Huimin LiKey Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Ministry of Education), University Engineering Research Center of Bioinformation and Genetic Improvement of Specialty Crops, and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China. huiminli@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Program, specifically under the category of Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Talents and Teams. 2024AC43009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum is a highly favored ornamental plant in landscaping applications, where its vibrant purplish-red foliage and dense clusters of purplish-red flowers create a striking contrast to the green leaves and white blossoms of its parent species, L. chinense. Despite extensive horticultural utilization, chloroplast genome divergence between L. chinense and its red-leaved variety is poorly characterized. Here, we sequenced and analyzed complete chloroplast genomes of L. chinense and other two horticultural selections of L. chinense var. rubrum exhibiting distinct flower colors. Through comparative genomics, we aimed to identify sequence-level variations and detect potential selection signatures in chloroplast genes. The results showed that the chloroplast genomes ranged from 159,425 to 159,452 bp, with variations primarily driven by insertions and deletions (INDELs) within single-copy regions, while inverted repeat (IR) regions were highly conserved. Three hypervariable regions (trnH-GUG-psbA, ndhD, ycf1 ) enabled the differentiation between L. chinense and its horticultural variety rubrum, and six other regions (e.g., psbA, rps16-trnQ-UUG, atpF) exhibited intraspecific variation unique to the latter. Furthermore, we detected signals of positive selection in the rpoB gene, which contains a micro-inversion unique to the light red-flowered individual. This inversion resulted in five amino acid substitutions, suggesting potential functional consequences for the gene product. These findings enhance our understanding of chloroplast genome evolution in L. chinense and provide valuable genetic tools for phylogenetic and population genomic studies.

Indexed as

FlowersGenome, ChloroplastChloroplastsPhylogenyChloroplast genomeComparative analysisGenome evolutionLoropetalum chinense

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.