ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2025
Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of Loropetalum chinense and its purplish-red-flowered variety.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum is a highly favored ornamental plant in landscaping applications, where its vibrant purplish-red foliage and dense clusters of purplish-red flowers create a striking contrast to the green leaves and white blossoms of its parent species, L. chinense. Despite extensive horticultural utilization, chloroplast genome divergence between L. chinense and its red-leaved variety is poorly characterized. Here, we sequenced and analyzed complete chloroplast genomes of L. chinense and other two horticultural selections of L. chinense var. rubrum exhibiting distinct flower colors. Through comparative genomics, we aimed to identify sequence-level variations and detect potential selection signatures in chloroplast genes. The results showed that the chloroplast genomes ranged from 159,425 to 159,452 bp, with variations primarily driven by insertions and deletions (INDELs) within single-copy regions, while inverted repeat (IR) regions were highly conserved. Three hypervariable regions (trnH-GUG-psbA, ndhD, ycf1 ) enabled the differentiation between L. chinense and its horticultural variety rubrum, and six other regions (e.g., psbA, rps16-trnQ-UUG, atpF) exhibited intraspecific variation unique to the latter. Furthermore, we detected signals of positive selection in the rpoB gene, which contains a micro-inversion unique to the light red-flowered individual. This inversion resulted in five amino acid substitutions, suggesting potential functional consequences for the gene product. These findings enhance our understanding of chloroplast genome evolution in L. chinense and provide valuable genetic tools for phylogenetic and population genomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41331180What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.