Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331170›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Distractor avoidance and early quitting in visual search.

Anjum Shaikh, Idah Mbithi, Maiko Okamura, Skylar Rice, Lily Rosan, Fabio Solorzano Quesada, Trafton Drew, Brennan Payne, Jeff Moher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anjum ShaikhUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Idah MbithiPsychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA.
Maiko OkamuraPsychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA.
Skylar RicePsychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA.
Lily RosanPsychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA.
Fabio Solorzano QuesadaPsychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA.
Trafton DrewSirona Medical, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brennan PayneDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jeff MoherPsychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA. jmoher@conncoll.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation BCS-2218384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current study, we examined the mechanisms underpinning how salient distractors produce early quitting in visual search. Participants completed a simple visual search task and indicated whether a target was present or absent. When salient distractors were present, fewer eye movements occurred before target-absent responses, and less of the display area was searched. Surprisingly, participants actively avoided directing eye movements towards the distractor. Still, salient distractors increased both search errors, which were committed when the target was never fixated, and decision errors, which were committed when the target was fixated but not detected. Our results demonstrate that salient distractors trigger early quitting by reducing the amount of information that observers extract from the search image and disrupting search guidance.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentional captureEye movements and visual attentionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID41331170
PMCPMC12672731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.