Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331132›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025

Prioritizing dumpsite risks and interventions: an overview and framework for action with a focus on LMICs.

Giovanni Vinti, Valerie Bauza, Thomas Clasen, Daniele Di Trapani, Gaspare Viviani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovanni VintiDeparment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. giovanni.vinti@unipa.it.
Valerie BauzaGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Thomas ClasenGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniele Di TrapaniDeparment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Gaspare VivianiDeparment of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dumpsites represent a major environmental and public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite increasing global waste generation, many regions still struggle to implement safe and sustainable waste management practices, resulting in significant pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and health risks due to uncontrolled waste disposal. Dumpsites lack containment measures, allowing pollutants to migrate through environmental matrices and reach different targets (e.g., human receptors). The primary objective of this review was to evaluate existing risk assessment procedures and propose a research direction for a standardized human health risk assessment (HHRA) methodology to prioritize interventions, starting with the most dangerous dumpsites in a given territory. The paper begins by presenting an overview of dumpsites, followed by a discussion on the pathways through which pollutants may migrate from dumpsites to human receptors and the associated health risks. Citing case studies, we explore the available environmental and health risk assessment methodologies, identifying and discussing key characteristics appropriate for dumpsites with a focus on LMICs where such sites are widespread and appropriate approaches are necessary. We identify and further discuss the relative HHRA as the most practical and reliable approach. We conclude with recommendations on research and policy.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsWaste Disposal FacilitiesWaste ManagementDeveloping CountriesEnvironmental PollutionHumansRisk AssessmentEnvironmental PollutantsComparative risk methodologyDumpsitesLMICsResearch directionRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41331132
PMCPMC12672625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.