ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
PAM: a propagation-based model for segmenting any 3D objects across multi-modal medical images.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for perioperative precision in surgical oncology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volumetric segmentation is a major challenge in medical imaging, as current methods require extensive annotations and retraining, limiting transferability across objects. We present PAM, a propagation-based framework that generates 3D segmentations from a minimal 2D prompt. PAM integrates a CNN-based UNet for intra-slice features with Transformer attention for inter-slice propagation, capturing structural and semantic continuity to enable robust cross-object generalization. Across 44 diverse datasets, PAM outperformed MedSAM and SegVol, improving average DSC by 19.3%. It maintained stable performance under variations in prompts (P ≥ 0.5985) and propagation settings (P ≥ 0.6131), while achieving faster inference (P < 0.001) and reducing user interaction time by 63.6%. Gains were strongest for irregular objects, with improvements negatively correlated with object regularity (r < -0.1249). By delivering accurate 3D segmentations from minimal input, PAM lowers reliance on manual annotation and task-specific training, providing an efficient and generalizable tool for automated clinical imaging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.