ArticleCommunications medicine2025
A deep learning-based approach to enhance accuracy and feasibility of long-term high-resolution manometry examinations.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis of Esophageal Manometry: A Narrative Review.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders. However, its short-term laboratory setting often fails to capture intermittent abnormalities. Long-term HRM (LTHRM, up to 24h) provides richer insights into swallowing behavior, but the resulting data volume is immense. Manual analysis by medical experts is laborious, time-consuming, and prone to errors, limiting its clinical feasibility.
methodsWe propose a deep learning-based approach for automatic analysis of LTHRM data. Our method detects both swallow events and secondary non-deglutitive motility disorders with high accuracy. Detected swallows are then clustered into distinct classes of similar events, creating a structured overview of motility patterns and their frequency. This reduces the analytical burden by allowing clinicians to focus on a small number of representative swallows rather than manually reviewing thousands of individual events. We evaluate our pipeline on 25 LTHRMs that were meticulously annotated, resulting in a dataset of more than 23,000 expert-labeled events.
resultsOur approach is able to detect more than 94% of all relevant events in LTHRM sequences, while the subsequent clustering is able to capture and group all relevant events into distinct swallow groups. To evaluate the overall approach, we conduct a user study with medical experts, demonstrating its effectiveness and positive clinical impact.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that deep learning-based approaches to analyze LTHRM examinations are capable of providing a more reliable and efficient diagnostic process, ultimately making LTHRM assessments more feasible in clinical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.