Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331064›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A human in the loop approach to applying large language models for farm management insight.

Spyridon Mourtzinis, Tatiane Severo Silva, Jason Chor Ming Lo, Damon L Smith, Shawn P Conley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Spyridon MourtzinisDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Madison, 1575 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. agstat001@gmail.com.
Tatiane Severo SilvaDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Madison, 1575 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Jason Chor Ming LoData Science Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 447 Lorch Ct, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. jason.lo@wisc.edu.
Damon L SmithDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Shawn P ConleyDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Madison, 1575 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable food production and security depend on increasing agricultural productivity within existing arable land. This necessitates the effective translation of complex agronomic research into actionable, field-specific crop management recommendations. Despite substantial advances in agricultural research, a persistent knowledge-practice gap continues to impede the widespread adoption of evidence-based management practices. We evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) can bridge this gap by generating crop management recommendations from scientific literature. Using US soybean production as a case study, we developed a semi-automated, human-in-the-loop pipeline (hereafter called "our system") adhering to systematic review protocols. Our system demonstrated high accuracy for literature screening, outperforming standalone models. However, when generating a general soybean management plan, expert evaluations rated two commercial LLMs' output more favorably than the plan from our system. This work highlights the need to develop systems that address user trust and provide tailored, field-specific advice that is both trustworthy and practically useful for farming communities.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrop ProductionFarmsLanguageGlycine maxHumansLarge Language ModelsModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID41331064
PMCPMC12789467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.