ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning based empathy mapping framework for enhancing user experience through app review analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of software applications largely depends on the user experience (UX), since it has a direct impact on user engagement and satisfaction. Empathy mapping is an important design thinking technique that organizes user perceptions into distinct categories for better understanding. However, traditional empathy mapping methods rely entirely on interviews and manual analysis which are both time-consuming and costly, thereby limiting the scalability of UX design and research. To address these challenges, this study presents an automated process for empathy mapping by analyzing user-posted app reviews. This study uses the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model for sentiment analysis, classifying user reviews as either positive (gain points or desires) or negative (pain points or frustrations). Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) is then used to apply topic modeling to pinpoint preferences and important themes. By concentrating on gains and pains, this method automates the traditional manual and costly process of design thinking and empathy mapping, making it more scalable and efficient through data-driven insights. In training, the proposed model with several versions of BERT model, the binary accuracy improved from 78.14 to 98.61%, with precision achieving 97.82%, F1 score of 98.62%, and recall up to 99.42%. The validation accuracy also increased from 87.40 to 92.58%, with an F1 score 92.59%, precision of 92.43%, and recall of 92.75%. These accurate results indicate that the proposed model may be used by user experience design teams, which will help them improve and streamline UX design while also assisting developers in promptly receiving user feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.