Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331023›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cadaveric evidence on lymph node counts and grossing accuracy in pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer staging.

Pal Tunksakul, Parkpoom Piyaman, Varat Woranisarakul, Nattaporn Wanvimolkul, Kittitad Sovikul, Katunyou Mahamongkol, Adisorn Ratanayotha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pal TunksakulDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Parkpoom PiyamanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Varat WoranisarakulDivision of Urological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Nattaporn WanvimolkulDivision of Urological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Kittitad SovikulDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Katunyou MahamongkolDivision of Urological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Adisorn RatanayothaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. adisorn.rat@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

Siriraj Research Development Fund, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University R016732017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) remains the most accurate method for staging prostate cancer, yet the adequacy of nodal yield and the absence of standardized specimen processing remain unresolved. This cadaveric study aimed to establish histologically verified benchmarks for lymph node number, size, and detectability. Super-extended PLND was performed in 13 male soft-embalmed cadavers prepared with arterial silicone injection. Specimens were grossed under stereomicroscopy, and all tissue was submitted for histology. A total of 641 lymph nodes were identified, with a median of 46 nodes per cadaver (range 17-92). All extended dissections exceeded the commonly proposed minimum threshold of 10 nodes. The median lymph node size was 4.1 mm, but only 58.1% were detected grossly, while 41.9% were identified exclusively by histology. Detection was strongly size-dependent, with logistic regression showing a 1.12-fold increase in odds for each additional millimeter in node size. These findings demonstrate substantial anatomical variability and highlight the limitations of gross-only protocols, which underestimate nodal yield and risk missing small nodes. Our results support extended PLND as a more reliable staging approach than limited dissection and emphasize the value of total histological submission to ensure accurate pathological staging in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPelvisAnatomical variabilityCadaveric studyGrossing protocolPelvic lymph node dissectionProstate cancerProstatectomy

Identifiers

PMID41331023
PMCPMC12765020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.