ArticleScientific reports2025
On the use of TabPFN on mass spectrometry analysis of volatile organic compounds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are key markers in applications ranging from food quality assessment to medical diagnostics that can be profiled, for example, by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or by direct injection mass spectrometry (e.g. proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry). The common practice in both cases is to construct a tabular dataset from the raw measurements by performing peak extraction across samples and use statistical or machine learning methods to analyze it. However, modeling VOC profiles is particularly challenging due to high dimensionality, noise, and small sample sizes. In this study, we evaluate the Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN), a foundation model recently introduced for tabular data, across diverse VOC datasets. Without requiring task-specific training, TabPFN achieves state-of-the-art performance in both classification and regression tasks, outperforming classical machine learning methods for most datasets. We further explore new strategies to enhance TabPFN’s performance, including ensembling and fine-tuning, finding that a plain ensemble seems to be the best option in this setting. Our results demonstrate that TabPFN is a highly effective modeling tool for VOC profiles obtained with different analytical approaches. It offers robust predictions even in the data-scarce, high-variability scenarios typical of real-world workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.