Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41331007›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

On the use of TabPFN on mass spectrometry analysis of volatile organic compounds.

Pablo M Granitto, Emanuela Betta, Iuliia Khomenko, Michele Pedrotti, Andrea Romano, Franco Biasioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo M GranittoResearch and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy. granitto@cifasis-conicet.gov.ar.
Emanuela BettaResearch and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Iuliia KhomenkoResearch and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Michele PedrottiResearch and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Andrea RomanoResearch and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Franco BiasioliResearch and Innovation Center, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy. franco.biasioli@fmach.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are key markers in applications ranging from food quality assessment to medical diagnostics that can be profiled, for example, by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or by direct injection mass spectrometry (e.g. proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry). The common practice in both cases is to construct a tabular dataset from the raw measurements by performing peak extraction across samples and use statistical or machine learning methods to analyze it. However, modeling VOC profiles is particularly challenging due to high dimensionality, noise, and small sample sizes. In this study, we evaluate the Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN), a foundation model recently introduced for tabular data, across diverse VOC datasets. Without requiring task-specific training, TabPFN achieves state-of-the-art performance in both classification and regression tasks, outperforming classical machine learning methods for most datasets. We further explore new strategies to enhance TabPFN’s performance, including ensembling and fine-tuning, finding that a plain ensemble seems to be the best option in this setting. Our results demonstrate that TabPFN is a highly effective modeling tool for VOC profiles obtained with different analytical approaches. It offers robust predictions even in the data-scarce, high-variability scenarios typical of real-world workflows.

Indexed as

PTR-ToF-MSTabPFNVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID41331007
PMCPMC12764826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.