ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction and parametric modeling of compressive strength of waste marble dust concrete through machine learning and experimental analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing the mechanical performance of sustainable industrial waste modified concrete using supervised machine learning modeling and feature importance analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hybrid Machine learning-based modeling to predict and optimize the compressive strength of electric arc furnace slag-modified concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of waste marble is the ultimate concern of the construction industry's recent success in satisfying the huge need for marble stones. This study predicts the compressive strength of waste marble powder concrete using machine learning methods XG Boost, AdaBoost, Cat-Boost, Gradient-Boosting, Light Gradient-Boosting, and decision tree. For this purpose, a comprehensive dataset was developed from previously published literature, incorporating input features such as cement, fine and coarse aggregates, superplasticizers, silica fume, marble dust, and water, with compressive strength (CS) as the output parameter. Based on the outcomes, XG Boost model outperforms other models to predict CS with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.