ArticleScientific reports2025
A chemical analysis of 20th century traditional medicines curated at the Ditsong museum of culture History, Pretoria, South Africa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the results of chemical tests conducted on the contents of seven 20th Century medicine containers, mostly from southern Africa, curated at the Ditsong Museum of Culture History. Our results reveal 56 discreet chemical compounds, most of which are plant secondary metabolites but including several toxins and a synthetic compound. A range of different ingredients, some of which could be from plant or animal origin, are implicated in each of the containers. Although most of the identified compounds have known medicinal and/or nutritional properties, some, like conhydrine, are toxic to humans, while others, like 1-naphtol, are synthetic and must indicate contamination, probably introduced during a preparatory stage of manufacture. We contextualise the results in reference to current knowledge of traditional African pharmacopeia and Materia Medica, which is intimately articulated within local cultures, customs and world views. Our study provides some new knowledge of the chemical constituents and possible preparatory contamination of traditional medicines during the 20th Century.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.