ArticleScientific reports2025
Paraspinal muscle fibres demonstrate a complex relationship between contractile variability and function in canines with spinal degeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paraspinal muscle dysfunction is associated with spinal degeneration, yet our understanding of the specifics of this muscle dysfunction is incomplete. Muscles consist of thousands of individual fibres, but little is known about the variability in functional capability amongst these fibres, particularly in muscles that display pathological features. This study investigated individual muscle fibre contractile function variability within paraspinal muscle biopsies from 19 chondrodystrophic canines undergoing surgery for intervertebral disc extrusion, and a control group of 10 healthy rats. Specific force, active modulus, and rate of force redevelopment (KTR) were tested in an average of 20 fibres from each biopsy. Correlations were computed between means and both standard deviations (absolute variability) and coefficient of variations (relative variability) for each contractile variable. Across contractile variables, canine muscle fibres demonstrated greater relative variability and lower means compared to rat controls, confirming pathological impairment. Notably, most relationships demonstrated negative correlations between contractile performance and relative variability, consistent with the hypothesis that more impaired muscles exhibit greater fibre-level heterogeneity. Interestingly, two canines demonstrated unusually high KTR in type 1 fibres, suggesting possible compensatory adaptation. These findings highlight altered within-muscle contractile function in spinal pathology and underscore the importance of fibre-level analysis for understanding muscle dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.