ArticleScientific data2025
Two high-quality genomes of Prototheca bovis strain SH08 and Prototheca ciferrii strain SH13.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Quality Genome Assemblies of Two Prototheca wickerhamii Strains.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Two high-quality genomes of Prototheca bovis strain SH08 and Prototheca ciferrii strain SH13.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prototheca, one of the foremost causative agents responsible for opportunistic infections in both humans and animals. Despite the availability of several Prototheca genomes, the genomes of Prototheca bovis and Prototheca ciferrii have remained unsequenced. In this study, we report two high-quality genome assemblies for P. bovis strain SH08 and P. ciferrii strain SH13, representing two distinct species of the genus Prototheca. The final assembled genome sizes were 30.6 Mb for P. bovis SH08 and 32.7 Mb for P. ciferrii SH13, with contig N50 values of 1.19 Mb and 1.78 Mb, respectively. The repetitive sequences were identified in 14.79% and 14.24% of the assembled genomes, respectively. A total of 5,141 protein-coding genes were predicted for P. bovis SH08, while P. ciferrii SH13 contained 4,986 protein-coding genes. Functional annotation identified 97.28% and 99.16% of the genes in the genomes, respectively. These two novel high-quality genome assemblies represent valuable resources for advancing research in evolutionary biology, comparative genomics, pathogenicity assessment, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic interventions in protothecosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.