Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330936›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Neural dissociation of attention and working memory through inhibitory control.

Yueyao Liu, Yingtao Fu, Enze Tang, Hang Wu, Junrong Han, Musi Xie, Yihui Zhang, Bo Peng, Jinhao Huang, Hanjun Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yueyao LiuDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yingtao FuDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Enze TangDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-9625
Hang WuSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Junrong HanSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Musi XieSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Yihui ZhangSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Bo PengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinhao HuangSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanjun LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-4193
Hui ChenDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. chenhui@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-216X
Pengmin QinSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China. qin.pengmin@m.scnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3569-6365

Funding

Brain Science and Brain-like ResearchNational Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31971032National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32171046National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32200844National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32371098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention and working memory (WM) have traditionally been considered closely linked processes with shared neural mechanisms. In information selection, attention is often conceptualized as a gatekeeper to WM, regulating which information is encoded and stored. Here, combining tasks specifically designed to separate attention from WM encoding with a multimodal approach, we provide converging neural and causal evidence that these processes are dissociable. Functional MRI identifies the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) as the key region enabling this dissociation, while dynamic causal modeling reveals the neural circuitry through which the SMG exerts inhibitory control over attentional representations, regulating their integration into WM. Furthermore, neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) demonstrates that enhancing SMG activity strengthens this inhibitory control. A second tDCS experiment using varied stimuli confirms the generalizability of the effect. Finally, a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiment provides further causal evidence with greater spatial precision. These findings challenge the long-standing view that attention and WM encoding form a continuous process, demonstrating instead that they constitute two dissociable neural processes of information selection.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermParietal LobeAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41330936
PMCPMC12764954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.