ArticleNature communications2025
Neural dissociation of attention and working memory through inhibitory control.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective encoding failure of self-face identity in subthreshold depression.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Neural dissociation of attention and working memory through inhibitory control.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attention and working memory (WM) have traditionally been considered closely linked processes with shared neural mechanisms. In information selection, attention is often conceptualized as a gatekeeper to WM, regulating which information is encoded and stored. Here, combining tasks specifically designed to separate attention from WM encoding with a multimodal approach, we provide converging neural and causal evidence that these processes are dissociable. Functional MRI identifies the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) as the key region enabling this dissociation, while dynamic causal modeling reveals the neural circuitry through which the SMG exerts inhibitory control over attentional representations, regulating their integration into WM. Furthermore, neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) demonstrates that enhancing SMG activity strengthens this inhibitory control. A second tDCS experiment using varied stimuli confirms the generalizability of the effect. Finally, a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiment provides further causal evidence with greater spatial precision. These findings challenge the long-standing view that attention and WM encoding form a continuous process, demonstrating instead that they constitute two dissociable neural processes of information selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.