Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330910›Full record

ReviewInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Bibliometric analysis of neurointerventional surgery: The scientific production of the specialty in the two leading specialty-specific journals.

Leonardo Bo Brenner, Victor Arthur Ohannesian, Bernardo Vieira Nogueira, João Artur Mateus Linhares, Sávio Batista, João Marcelo Baptista, Raphael Camerotte, Luis F Fabrini Paleare, Pedro Henrique Cieslak, Raphael Bertani

Expression of concernAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leonardo Bo BrennerDepartment of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-5612-556X
Victor Arthur OhannesianDepartment of Medicine, Albert Einstein Israeli Faculty of Health Sciences (FICSAE), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-8742-1818
Bernardo Vieira NogueiraDepartment of Medicine, Serra dos Órgãos University Center, Teresópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-8860-0946
João Artur Mateus LinharesDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Sávio BatistaGrady Memorial Hospital, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-0505
João Marcelo BaptistaDepartment of Medicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Raphael CamerotteDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-2842-4986
Luis F Fabrini PaleareFaculty of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-7522-7801
Pedro Henrique CieslakDepartment of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-6080-0083
Raphael BertaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6546-2634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionIn recent decades, neurovascular practice has shifted from open surgical procedures to interventional neuroradiology. Within this evolving landscape, two journals-Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) and Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS)-have become central platforms for disseminating impactful research.MethodsA bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database to identify the 500 most cited articles published in Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) and the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS). Each article was categorized by study type, procedure, and pathology. Bibliometric data were analyzed using R and VOSviewer to map influential studies and collaborative networks within the field.ResultsA total of 6813 articles were screened. The 500 most cited, comprising 439 from JNIS and 61 from INR, were analyzed. Citation counts averaged 70.71 per article, with the top-cited study reaching 371 citations. A marked increase in high-impact publications occurred from 2020 to 2024, reflecting growing output in the field. The United States led in total publications and citations. Trending topics evolved from early focuses on pediatric cases and aneurysms to current emphases on stroke, thrombectomy, flow diverters, and artificial intelligence. This was confirmed by keyword analysis, demonstrating the dominance of cerebrovascular pathology and minimally invasive techniques in recent neurointerventional research.ConclusionThis analysis highlights the central role of ischemic stroke and aneurysm treatment in neurointervention, with thrombectomy and endovascular therapies driving clinical advances. The field shows increasing global engagement and a shift toward higher-level evidence, reflecting its maturation. While foundational studies remain influential, recent research is poised to define future directions and innovation.

Indexed as

Bibliometric studyinterventional neuroradiologyneurointervention

Identifiers

PMID41330910
PMCPMC12675232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.