Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330902›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Self-doping of biological secretions for waste catalyst reuse.

Min Li, Liya Fu, Yue Yuan, Yin Yu, Xiaoguang Jin, Zhouyang Li, Yutang Zeng, Xiang Liu, Chunli Wan, Yu Sun and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Min LiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Liya FuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Yue YuanState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Yin YuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Xiaoguang JinSinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100875, China.
Zhouyang LiKey Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.
Yutang ZengKey Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.
Xiang LiuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Chunli WanDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China. wan@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-4869
Yu SunSchool of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710126, China.
Min XuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Panxin WangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Hongbo XiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Yudong SongState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Qi HuangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Yuexi ZhouState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.
Changyong WuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China. wu.changyong@craes.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9474-5916

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (Beijing Natural Science Foundation) 8242044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tremendous costs of disposal and potential environmental problems caused by waste catalysts bring about an urgent need for catalyst regeneration without loss of catalytic activity and stability. Here, we report on a simple and reproducible method to regenerate waste ozonation catalysts by carbonization of self-doped biological secretions to synthesize highly active and stable carbon-based nano-single-atom-site catalysts (NSASCs), Cu@graphitic carbon (GC)-Al

Indexed as

RecyclingAdsorptionAluminum OxideBiological Oxygen Demand AnalysisCarbonCatalysisCopperGraphiteMetal NanoparticlesOzoneAluminum OxideCarbonCopperGraphiteOzone

Identifiers

PMID41330902
PMCPMC12673070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.