ArticleNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2026
Patterns of parenteral nutrition use in the inpatient setting: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParenteral nutrition (PN) supports patients unable to absorb sufficient nutrients from their gastrointestinal tracts. Yet, information about the patterns and extent of PN's in-hospital use is lacking. Data on this topic should provide comparison points for nutrition support teams and hospital administrators examining PN use in their institutions.
methodsA retrospective cohort study using 9 years of routinely collected administrative data from a healthcare system with tertiary care and community hospitals explored the extent, patterns, and trends of PN use in hospitals and individual clinical departments.
resultsPN was administered to 2984 patients during 4121 admissions to the tertiary facility for 68,047 days and to 298 patients on 367 admissions to the community hospital for 4925 days. Both hospitals' general surgery, surgical intensive care unit, and other surgical services accounted for half the patients receiving PN. The tertiary care hospital's adult and pediatric oncology/hematology/bone marrow transplantation services, services not provided in the community hospital, accounted for 29% of the hospital's patients receiving PN. Fifty-two percent of surgical patients accounted for 46% of PN-days, whereas the 29% of patients from the hematology/oncology/bone marrow transplantation services utilized 39% of PN-days, with longer durations of PN administration reflected in the latter group. Adult oncology admissions involving PN tripled (from 38 to 116 patients) between the first and last 3 years.
conclusionDifferent case mixes in the tertiary and community hospitals affected the extent and patterns of PN use. Dataset analysis provided an analytic framework for examining PN usage within and among hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.