ArticleCell proliferation2026
RETRACTION: miR-709 Up-Regulated in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Promotes Proliferation and Invasion by Targeting GPC5.
Article in Cell proliferation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionT. Liu, X. Zhang, K. Sha, X. Liu, L. Zhang and B. Wang, "miR-709 Up-Regulated in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Promotes Proliferation and Invasion by Targeting GPC5," Cell Proliferation 48, no. 3 (2015): 330-337, https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12181. The above article, published online on 27 March 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Qi Zhou; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon following the identification of duplicated elements between Figures 5c and 7c, which were reported to represent different experimental conditions. The authors provided some supporting data; however, it was insufficient to fully address the concerns. As a result, the editors have lost confidence in the reliability of the results. The authors did not respond when asked to agree to the final wording of the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.