Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330610›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025

Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus placebo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: 10 year follow-up of the FIMPACT randomised, placebo surgery controlled trial.

Kari Kanto, Mathias Bäck, Thomas Ibounig, Robert Björkenheim, Antti Malmivaara, Tomasz Czuba, Jari Inkinen, Juha Kalske, Vesa Savolainen, Ilkka Sinisaari and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00428870 (Arthroscopic Decompression Versus Diagnostic Arthroscopy Without Subacromial Decompression Versus Supervised Exercise Therapy in Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trail.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00428870 naunknown statusnot on this map

Arthroscopic Decompression Versus Diagnostic Arthroscopy Without Subacromial Decompression Versus Supervised Exercise Therapy in Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trail.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HelsinkiRan2005 to 2024Enrolled210ConditionsSubacromial Impingement SyndromeArmsArthroscopic acromioplasty or arthroscopy alone (sham) or conservative treatment (rehabilitation)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kari KantoFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mathias BäckFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Thomas IbounigFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Robert BjörkenheimFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti MalmivaaraNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Economics, Helsinki, Finland.
Tomasz CzubaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jari InkinenPhysiotherapy centre Fysios Mehiläinen, Tampere, Finland.
Juha KalskeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi hospital, Espoo, Finland.
Vesa SavolainenPihlajalinna Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilkka SinisaariTerveystalo Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirjo ToivonenFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Simo TaimelaFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Teppo L N JärvinenFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika PaavolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, PO Box 320, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland mika.paavola@hus.fi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2506-2115
Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the long term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) versus placebo surgery (diagnostic arthroscopy) and exercise therapy in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.

designRandomised, placebo surgery controlled trial.

settingOrthopaedic department of three public hospitals in Finland.

participants210 adults aged 35 to 65 years with symptoms consistent with subacromial pain syndrome for more than three months, enrolled from 1 February 2005 with 10 year follow-up to 20 September 2023. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation in the primary (ASD versus placebo surgery) comparison.

interventionsASD, placebo surgery, and exercise therapy (1:1:1). Exercise therapy was used as a pragmatic comparator.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity, both assessed at 10 years using a visual analogue scale (VAS, ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting no pain). The minimally important difference was defined as 15. A mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance was used, treating participants as random factors, incorporating baseline values as covariates.

resultsParticipants were randomly assigned to ASD (n=59), placebo surgery (n=63), and exercise therapy (n=71). Of these, a total of 168 participants (87%) completed the 10 year follow-up. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis (ASD versus placebo surgery), no between group differences were observed for the two primary outcomes at 10 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus placebo surgery) was -1.5 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -8.6 to 5.6) in VAS pain score at rest and -3.2 points (-13.0 to 6.5) in VAS pain score on arm activity. No significant between group differences were found for any of the secondary outcomes or adverse events. In the pragmatic comparison, the mean difference between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) was -4.0 points (-11.0 to 3.0) in VAS pain score at rest and -9.4 points (-19.0 to 0.3) in VAS pain score on arm activity. No significant between group differences were observed for the secondary outcomes or adverse events.

conclusionIn patients with subacromial pain syndrome, ASD offered no benefit over placebo surgery or exercise therapy during 10 year follow-up.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00428870.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyDecompression, SurgicalShoulder Impingement SyndromeShoulder PainAdultAgedExercise TherapyFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41330610
PMCPMC12670246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.