ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2025
State-Specific Extraction of Environmental DNA: Spike-and-Recovery Controls to Validate and Optimise Extraction Protocols.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- State-Specific Extraction of Environmental DNA: Spike-and-Recovery Controls to Validate and Optimise Extraction Protocols.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Getting insights into the quantitative and qualitative contribution of different DNA states, i.e., extracellular (exDNA) and intracellular DNA (iDNA), to the total environmental DNA (eDNA) pool requires reliable methods for their separation. Even though a multitude of respective extraction protocols has been published, their validation is often missing. Here, we selected four protocols for the state-specific extraction of eDNA and traced the separation of exDNA and iDNA within natural environments using previously designed spike-and-recovery controls. Besides accounting for the different eDNA states, the spike-ins also distinguished different bacterial origins (gram-positive, gram-negative). Following their quantification by digital PCR, the recovery of exDNA and iDNA spike-ins in both the target as well as nontarget eDNA states differed among the selected extraction protocols and environmental matrices, albeit the effect of the former was far more decisive. While the recovery of exDNA spike-ins was mainly affected by the chemical composition of the washing buffer and the duration of each washing step, the lysis method determined the recovery of spiked iDNA. These aspects were further combined within an optimised protocol, providing a valuable step towards a more concise understanding of factors governing the state-specific extraction of eDNA and hence their relevance in molecular microbial ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.