ArticleThe Journal of school health2026
Tracking Secondary School Students: A Qualitative Investigation of an Online Student Monitoring System With Parent Portal.
Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tracking Secondary School Students: A Qualitative Investigation of an Online Student Monitoring System With Parent Portal.The Journal of school health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe transition to secondary school brings academic and social challenges, with student monitoring systems offering real-time insights to enhance communication between students, parents, and teachers. While these systems improve tracking and support, their effects on student autonomy, wellbeing, and parent-child dynamics are understudied.
methodsThis exploratory research examines the perspectives of five students, seven parents, and twelve teachers using Dutch secondary school systems with parent portals, by conducting semi-structured interviews.
resultsResults of the interviews show benefits such as improved teacher communication and better parental support for students but also challenges such as increased teacher workload and concerns over student privacy, autonomy, and well-being. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Schools should balance the benefits of student monitoring systems with their impact on autonomy and well-being. While progress tracking is valuable, unrestricted parental access may lead to over-monitoring. Limiting access to designated times (e.g., four times a year) can preserve student independence while keeping parents informed.
conclusionThe study highlights the need for balanced system design to protect students' wellbeing and autonomy while enhancing educational collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.