Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41330278›Full record

ArticleCognition2026

Emotional learning selectively distorts the temporal organization of memory: A quantitative synthesis.

Patrick A F Laing, Augustin C Hennings, Samuel E Cooper, Joseph E Dunsmoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick A F LaingDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America; Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America. Electronic address: patrick.laing@austin.utexas.edu.
Augustin C HenningsPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, United States of America.
Samuel E CooperDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America; Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.
Joseph E DunsmoorDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America; Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.

Funding

Localizing and modulating competing memories of fear and safety in the human brainR01MH122387 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNSMOOR, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
Computational Neuroscience to Decode Higher-Order Fear in PTSDK23MH138889 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Samuel Emerson Cooper · 2025 to 2026
$874k
Using latent cause modeling and neurofeedback to understand fear relapse and its relationship to anxietyF32MH140486 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Augustin Cole Hennings · 2025 to 2026
$160k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH140486NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH138889NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic memory allows us to remember when an event occurred by situating it within a coherent temporal context. Pavlovian fear conditioning, a widely studied form of associative emotional learning, creates implicit memories for neutral stimuli paired with aversive outcomes. However, conditioning's influence on the temporal organization of episodic memory remains poorly understood. We addressed this by analyzing data from 17 multi-session hybrid conditioning-memory experiments (N = 474). Participants encoded non-repeating category items, with items from one category (CS+) being aversively reinforced (shocks) during threat conditioning but presented without shock before and after conditioning. The next day, recognition memory ('did you see this image yesterday?') and temporal source memory ('when did you see this image?') were tested for each category item. We had two aims; (1) examine the robustness of temporal memory distortion across different experiment groups, and (2) test whether these temporal effects were associated with recognition memory performance. CS+ category exemplars were disproportionately (mis)attributed to the conditioning phase, even if they were encoded before or afterwards, and this effect strongly predicted selective recognition memory (CS+ > CS-). Overall temporal source bias effects and source-item memory associations were largely resistant to between-experiment variations, including month-long encoding-retrieval intervals, varying shock intensities, and enhanced extinction. Paradoxically, salient emotional experiences may enhance memory for neutral events by distorting their perceived position in time. This mechanism may safeguard potentially relevant information by anchoring otherwise forgettable experiences to salient contexts, supporting their preservation in long-term memory.

Indexed as

Association LearningConditioning, ClassicalEmotionsFearMemory, EpisodicRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEmotional memoryEpisodic memoryFear conditioningSource memoryTemporal contextTemporal memory

Identifiers

PMID41330278
PMCPMC13421835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.