ReviewInternational dental journal2026
Harnessing and Optimizing α-TCP for Oral Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Dentistry.
Review in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid) Binder-Based Self-Hardening Calcium Phosphate Bone Scaffolds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the Periosteal Niche with Regenerated Cellulose Nanofibers for Endogenous Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Development and Characterization of Water-Based Porous Calcium Phosphate Bone Cements for Peri-Implant Regeneration: An In Situ Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cotton-Type Nanofiber Guided Pathway Engineering Enables Rapid Tissue Integration and Accelerated Bone Regeneration in Mineral Powder-Based Bone Grafts.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
α-Tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP), a resorbable calcium phosphate bioceramic, has emerged as a promising biomaterial for oral tissue regeneration due to its exceptional osteoconductive properties and compositional similarity to natural bone. During hydrolysis, α-TCP releases calcium (Ca²⁺) and phosphate (PO₄³⁻) ions that actively promote tissue mineralization, making it particularly valuable for applications in periodontal bone repair, periapical lesion treatment, and dental hard tissue remineralization. However, while α-TCP demonstrates excellent initial osteogenic activity, its rapid degradation kinetics in physiological environments often lead to premature structural collapse, localized hyperphosphatemia, and inconsistent bone formation outcomes. This review examines the current applications of α-TCP in oral medicine, with particular focus on its clinical use in apexification, alveolar ridge preservation, and guided bone regeneration. We critically analyse the material's limitations, including its mechanical instability in load-bearing sites and unpredictable resorption profiles that may hinder long-term regenerative outcomes. Emerging strategies to overcome these challenges are discussed, such as the development of composite systems combining α-TCP with β-TCP, hydroxyapatite, or biodegradable polymers to achieve optimized degradation rates and enhanced mechanical performance. Furthermore, we explore innovative approaches in material design, including surface functionalization with bioactive molecules and the fabrication of three-dimensional printed (3D-printed) α-TCP scaffolds with controlled porosity. The review concludes by identifying key research directions for the field, emphasizing the need for improved in vivo degradation models, standardized clinical evaluation protocols, and the development of smart α-TCP composites capable of spatiotemporal control over ion release. By addressing these challenges, α-TCP-based materials may realize their full potential as next-generation solutions for oral tissue engineering and regenerative dentistry. Furthermore, this review uniquely synthesizes the literature by grouping findings according to key performance outcomes - including mechanical strength, degradation kinetics, and osteogenic efficacy - to provide a clear, comparative analysis of how different material design strategies directly influence biological and functional results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.