ReviewClinical endoscopy2026
Non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: emerging tools and clinical evidence.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Computational Models in the Detection of Colorectal Carcinoma and Precancerous Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a widely used non-invasive screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC) in many countries, valued for its simplicity, affordability, and reasonable sensitivity. Typically recommended on an annual or biennial basis, the FIT is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality by facilitating early detection. Stool DNA tests, including multitarget DNA tests and DNA methylation assays, demonstrate higher sensitivity than FIT for CRC and advanced adenomas, although they have slightly lower specificity and higher cost. These tests are generally performed at longer intervals, such as every 3 years, and are useful alternatives for individuals who are unwilling or unable to undergo a colonoscopy. Emerging non-invasive CRC screening tools, such as liquid biopsy, microRNA, microbiome tests, and urine-based tests, are being developed to improve patient compliance and test convenience. In particular, liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive option that may be more acceptable to populations hesitant to undergo stool-based tests. Furthermore, the integration of machine learning with metagenomic sequencing data has shown promise in distinguishing patients with CRC from healthy individuals. As CRC screening evolves, these novel approaches may enable the development of more personalized, accessible, and effective screening strategies, ultimately improving adherence and reducing CRC-related mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.