Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329924›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Developing a Data Trust Model (Not Only) for Sleep Research: Conceptual Study and Quantitative Survey.

Raphael Jan Dressle, Dieter Riemann, Nicole Thoma, Christina Erler, Rodger Burmeister, Bianka Jogwitz, Katharina Domschke, Kai Spiegelhalder, Joachim Boldt, Svenja Wiertz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Raphael Jan DressleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, c/o Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hauptstraße 5, Freiburg, 79104, Germany, 49 761 270-65570.ORCID 0000-0001-9408-5196
Dieter RiemannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, c/o Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hauptstraße 5, Freiburg, 79104, Germany, 49 761 270-65570.ORCID 0000-0002-1968-6220
Nicole ThomaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, c/o Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hauptstraße 5, Freiburg, 79104, Germany, 49 761 270-65570.ORCID 0000-0002-5994-8715
Christina ErlerFZI Research Center for Information Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-5587
Rodger BurmeisterFZI Research Center for Information Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1847-0003
Bianka JogwitzMedical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-4557-4863
Katharina DomschkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, c/o Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hauptstraße 5, Freiburg, 79104, Germany, 49 761 270-65570.ORCID 0000-0002-2550-9132
Kai SpiegelhalderDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, c/o Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hauptstraße 5, Freiburg, 79104, Germany, 49 761 270-65570.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-3464
Joachim BoldtDepartment of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9219-7933
Svenja WiertzDepartment of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5255-7933
Bernd FeigeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, c/o Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hauptstraße 5, Freiburg, 79104, Germany, 49 761 270-65570.ORCID 0000-0002-9436-1258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A large amount of data are generated in health care facilities, yet it is rarely made available for secondary research use. The reasons are manifold. Most importantly, different stakeholders' needs must be balanced. However, there are currently hardly any feasible solutions for this. Objective: This study aimed to develop a data trust model with supporting user interface applications to provide a legally and ethically sound framework for secondary use of medical data. The development was based on extensive surveys of various stakeholders. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with researchers (data users) and institutional representatives of the Medical Center-University of Freiburg, and online questionnaires were administered to patients (data subjects), data users, and institutional representatives. The questionnaire for data subjects covered the dimensions of trust (measured with a 5-point Likert scale), quality of interaction and involvement (measured with a 4-point Likert scale), subjective and objective understanding, and usability (measured with the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale). For all other stakeholder groups, the questionnaire focused on usability measured using the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale. The surveys comprised a requirement elicitation followed by two rounds of evaluation. Independent-samples Welch t tests were used to compare group means between the first and second evaluations. Results: We devised SouveMed, a framework for secondary use of medical data, applied to the use case of sleep research data. The model includes secure onboarding of data subjects and using digital consent and a digital interface for data users for onboarding, defining research aims, querying the amount of available data, and, finally, either downloading data or having algorithms run on it. At its core is a data trust entity that matches descriptions, consents, and constraints of all stakeholders using digital representations and constraint-solving techniques. Fourteen participants took part in the requirements elicitation, 22 in the first evaluation, and 16 in the second evaluation. In both the first and the second evaluations, data subjects showed a high level of trust in the concept, with mean ratings on the trust scale of 4.23 (SD 0.46) in the first and 4.23 (SD 0.68) in the second evaluation (t15.78=0.03, P=.97). Regarding usability, the mean functionality score of the data user system increased from 3.56 (SD 0.77) in the first to 4.58 (SD 0.38) out of 5 points in the second evaluation (t10.69=-3.28, P=.008). The mean functionality score of the data subject system increased from 4.30 (SD 0.41) in the first to 4.50 (SD 0.74) in the second evaluation (t13.99=-0.75, P=.46). Conclusions: The SouveMed concept provides a comprehensive framework for the secondary use of medical data. The developed processes can be adapted to other areas of medical research.

Indexed as

SleepTrustAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesconsent managementdata trustdigital infrastructurehealth datainformed consentpatient participationsleepsleep researchsurveytrust

Identifiers

PMID41329924
PMCPMC12671904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.