Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329914›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Virtual Wound Care in Australian Nursing Homes: Protocol for a Pilot and Feasibility Study.

Heather Russell, Annie Banbury, Katherine Smith, Michelle Barakat-Johnson, Meredith Makeham, Georgina Luscombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather RussellSchool of Rural Health Dubbo/Orange, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box 1191, Orange, New South Wales, 2800, Australia, +61253104134.ORCID 0000-0002-7177-720X
Annie BanburyCoviu Global Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8841-1215
Katherine SmithSchool of Rural Health Dubbo/Orange, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box 1191, Orange, New South Wales, 2800, Australia, +61253104134.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-7996
Michelle Barakat-JohnsonNursing and Midwifery, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7764-4515
Meredith MakehamFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7510-0901
Georgina LuscombeSchool of Rural Health Dubbo/Orange, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box 1191, Orange, New South Wales, 2800, Australia, +61253104134.ORCID 0000-0002-4767-5131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic wounds, those which have not healed in a timely manner, are a significant health and economic burden. Older people, especially those living in nursing homes, are disproportionately affected by chronic wounds, and effective management and prevention is a persistent challenge. Specialized wound care can improve outcomes; however, access is limited by aged care workforce shortages, fragmented care, and lack of local services, especially in rural and nursing home settings. Virtual wound care interventions such as WoundView (Coviu Global Pty Ltd), a novel computer vision-based artificial intelligence wound analysis app embedded in Coviu's existing telehealth platform, offer a potential solution to enhance engagement with specialized wound care services. Objective: This protocol aims to outline a pilot and feasibility study for WoundView to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in preparation for a planned implementation study. The pilot and feasibility study will estimate recruitment and retention rates along with protocol adherence and adaptations. Qualitative exploration of the acceptability of recruitment processes, training and education, participant assessments, intervention delivery, and secondary outcome measures will inform the development of an implementation study of WoundView. Methods: The WoundView pilot and feasibility study is a prospective, nonrandomized study in 2 nursing homes in New South Wales, Australia. The research population will comprise up to 10 nursing home residents, 10 to 30 nursing home staff, and 10 wound care clinicians. All resident participants will receive the intervention, WoundView, as routine clinical care throughout the study period. Virtual care will be conducted with a specialized wound care clinic using WoundView's wound analysis and telehealth features to guide the clinical management of chronic wounds. Wound measures, health-related quality of life, virtual care activity, hospitalization rates, health resource use case studies, and participant satisfaction will be assessed. Nursing home staff and wound care clinicians' satisfaction with WoundView will be collected through brief surveys and in-depth interviews. Results: The WoundView pilot and feasibility study was approved by the university's ethics committee and registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry. Recruitment and enrollment for the study began in May 2025. Results are expected in the second half of 2025. Conclusions: The design and implementation of virtual care interventions in nursing homes is an underinvestigated issue. Outcomes from this study will contribute to the design of an implementation study testing WoundView in a range of nursing homes around Australia. The integration of WoundView is expected to transform the use of virtual care for wound management and lead to earlier intervention and increased access to specialist wound advice services for nursing home residents.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesWounds and InjuriesAgedAustraliaFeasibility StudiesHumansNew South WalesPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTelemedicineWound Healingchronic woundhomes for the agednursing homespilot and feasibility studytelehealthvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID41329914
PMCPMC12671902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.