Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329769›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An optical method for deriving the anterior and posterior curvatures of intraocular lenses using dual back-vertex power measurements.

Damien Gatinel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Damien GatinelRothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-0500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a theoretical framework to estimate the anterior and posterior radii of curvature of a thick intraocular lens (IOL) by measuring its back-vertex power in two orientations. Armed with the lens thickness, refractive index, and a potential axial offset d from haptic angulation, one can determine the individual surface powers and, thus, the geometry of the implant. Using paraxial optics, we derive the back-vertex power in normal and flipped orientations. We consider two cases: d = 0 (no haptic-induced offset) and [Formula: see text] (finite shift). In the d = 0 case, using standard paraxial relations (y-[Formula: see text] method), we obtain compact expressions that allow direct recovery of the surface powers from the dual back-vertex powers. For [Formula: see text], the measured powers are first mapped back to the lens vertex (Eq 11), after which the same closed-form retrieval as for d = 0 applies. When d = 0, a closed-form solution yields the surface powers [Formula: see text] and radii [Formula: see text]. If the lens is shifted by d, we first correct to the vertex plane (Eq 11) and then apply the same closed-form relations. Though lens nominal power alone does not reveal geometry, our dual-orientation approach recovers how much power resides on each surface, benefiting thick-lens IOL power formulas and refining predictions in cataract surgery planning.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularOptics and PhotonicsHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID41329769
PMCPMC12671823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.