ArticlePloS one2025
Perceived clinical and ethical impact of digital transformation in healthcare and research: A survey in the MENA region.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MediaPipe-Based Activity Analysis by Healthcare Professionals: Method Development and Technology Acceptance-A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe shift toward digital medical records and communication represents a transformative change in healthcare practices and research. However, this transition is marked by challenges related to the ethics of digital health adoption in fragile and conflict-affected areas, particularly in areas where healthcare providers lack prior training and preparation.
objectiveTo assess healthcare and research professionals' adoption, attitudes, perceptions, and ethical considerations toward digital transformation in healthcare and research across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 20 MENA countries involving 990 health professionals and researchers. Demographic data was collected, as well as questions related to the impact, attitudes, and ethics of digital health transformation. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods to identify patterns and correlations between sociodemographic factors and responses.
resultsThe results indicate that digital health transformation in the MENA region was perceived as limited to moderate across key domains, with relatively positive scores on attitudes and ethical considerations. While foundational technologies, such as electronic health records, show moderate adoption, other advanced tools remain underutilized. The study also revealed a significant lack of formal training in digital health (p < 0.001) despite high digital proficiency among participants (p < 0.001). However, ethical concerns were highlighted as key issues with strong support for enhanced bioethics literacy. These findings align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and emphasize the need to develop inclusive policies, implement robust regulatory frameworks, create targeted educational programs, make infrastructure investments, and foster stakeholder collaboration to promote the ethical use of digital health technologies.
conclusionDigital transformation in healthcare and research is viewed positively across the MENA region, but significant gaps remain in adoption, training, and governance. Addressing these gaps will be essential to ensure safe, equitable, and sustainable digital health implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.